- 10When are specifications not enough?
- 11Where is the state of the work kept?
- 12Who prepares a change before coding starts?
- 13What does impact analysis tell you, and when does it run?
- 14How do coding agents use the graph?
- 15How is each change checked, and how does the graph stay current?
- 16Who decides which work agents do?
- 17How do managers see what people and agents are doing?
- 18What happens across many products?
- 19What about existing systems and technical debt?
- 20What changes for the team?
- 21What results have teams seen?
Home / Follow the story / Scene 21: What results have teams seen?
Transcript
21. What results have teams seen?
Engagements under Breeze.AI report these results, each in its own context. On one engagement across three products, deployments rose from 19 to 36 a month over a fourteen-week pilot. On the same engagement, lead time for changes fell from 2.0 to 1.42 days. Extracting the graph from a codebase of more than two million lines took two to three weeks. On one brownfield application, impact analysis replaced three to five days of investigation by a senior engineer before each change. In the first sprint of a new user-interface workstream, 53% of design components were reused. Defects fell 23% compared with the same team's results before Semantic Engineering, on the same codebase. Test coverage reached 93.4%, with test scenarios generated from the functional layer and no manual scenario writing. A cost model puts five-year total cost 81% lower when the AI runs on the client's own infrastructure; the figure comes from the model and was not measured on an engagement.
On the site: Numbers from Real Engagements · Case Archetypes: Continuous SDLC
Choose a path
The full video in six parts and an appendix, one part at a time.